Canadian Electrical Wholesaler

Apr 15, 2019

Human CapitalBy Bill Howatt, Jesse Adams and Mike Roberts


Workforce productivity can be defined as the amount of services or goods a workforce produces within an expressed time and budget. Senior leaders, when setting their expectations and measures for organizational success, must factor in workforce productivity with respect to what influences it both positively and negatively. If this is not done, the risk for failure intensifies.

When designing budgets, senior leaders typically want to understand the measurable impact of any investment or disinvestment on the workforce, and the expected impact workforce productivity will have on financials. The absence of this information often can often delay or even prevent action.

Employee engagement has typically been the go-to metric to measure workforce productivity through job satisfaction. However, if this metric is not connected to organizational key performance indicators (KPIs) such as customer index, absenteeism, disability, turnover, and financial results, then what is the true benefit with respect to understanding how engagement is impacting productivity?

For example, company ABC’s engagement rate of 72% moved to 77% in the past 12 months. What does this really mean? Though this 5% increase may net a manager a bonus, without clear evidence of the links between the engagement score and other key metrics it is difficult to determine the impact. For many organizations under examination, this is often a gap.


The gaps in measuring workforce productivity have led Morneau Shepell to look beyond engagement to measure the relationships between health, engagement and productivity. By examining this link between employees’ key performance behaviours (KPBs) and financial results, leaders are in a position to accurately predict the behaviours that positively or negatively impact productivity.


In Morneau Shepell’s white paper The next evolution of strategic HR: Measuring program value through business results we introduced a new line of thinking around strategic HR. This white paper also introduced the role and importance of key performance behaviours for driving key performance indicators (KPIs).

Additionally, we introduced our approach for measuring programs’ impacts with respect to how they can positively shape KBPs. The measurement model introduced is based on our methodology for calculating the value of investment (VOI) and the impact on workforce productivity.

Ultimately, workforce productivity is defined by the sum of every employee’s individual contribution. The total collective effort of the employee base defines the human capital workforce productivity contribution factor. No two human beings have the same capacity, needs and motivation, and as such, the complexity for influencing human capital increases. Simply put, there is no silver bullet. There is not one single policy, procedure or program that will solve the challenge of how to get the most out of every FTE with respect to productivity.

Most senior leaders have seen dollars wasted on random acts of wellness and other types of programs that have not had any major long-term effect, nor reached those who, in particular, have low productivity due to health or motivation factors. As a result, there may be a degree of scepticism or conservative thinking with respect to investing in human capital health and engagement to drive productivity. In fairness, they are looking for the evidence and the link between their investment and improved productivity.

Senior leaders will invest heavily in workforce productivity when they believe that there will be a real measureable return on the investment. Many leaders will not even consider an investment without seeing demonstrated case studies with results provided by other organizations.

The IT revolution has driven big investments with the hope that new, powerful IT solutions will improve workforce productivity. Interestingly, the impact of technology advancements in the workplace on human capacity were not thought out or anticipated. For example, the evolution of handheld devices brought with it an expectation of the 24/7 workplace, resulting in many employees feeling that they are chained to email. For them, IT has increased their perceived workload, the length of their workday, and the weight of a real or perceived continuous demand on their time and energy.

Even with this knowledge and insight, IT continues to roar on. Organizations have invested billions, if not trillions, of dollars in IT to upgrade ERP and HRIS systems. With all the IT advancements in infrastructure, software, Internet, robots, and the evolution of the cloud, the common goal was to maximize workforce productivity. Perhaps a crude way to put it: how can organizations maximize their dollars so they can do more with less human capital? Why? Human capital is often viewed as expensive, complex, and hard to manage and maintain over the long term. Regardless, there will never be enough IT to remove all people.

Organizations need people in order to exist.

Another area senior leaders have invested in heavily is reducing waste, driving efficiencies, and increasing workforce productivity through process mapping and improved documentation. As with significant investments in IT, organizations have invested billions of dollars in process management systems such as six sigma and ISO.

In addition to these hard advancements there have been changes in governance related to how human capital should be managed in order to positively impact the employee contribution, workplace experience and overall workforce productivity. For example, there has been a growth in the emphasis and commitment put on employees’ physical and psychological safety, such as occupational health and safety (OHS), workers compensation, human rights, and the National Standard of Canada for Psychological Health and Safety in the Workplace (the Standard). These are collectively influencing decision-makers with respect to policies (e.g., mental health policy), procedures (e.g., harassment investigation), programs (e.g., EAFP, depression care and PTS support) and benefits plans (e.g., psychological service support).

The link between employees’ health, engagement and productivity is becoming more and more evident. This is why Morneau Shepell, in partnership with The Globe and Mail, has created a new employer of choice award to add to this growing conversation. Promoting and supporting the benefits of employees’ total health on productivity through early prevention and detection of chronic physical and mental health conditions can help decrease the associated hard costs (e.g., absence, STD/LTD/WCB, and drug costs) on an organization’s bottom line.


There is no getting around it: business needs people


One last piece that will define workforce productivity is human capital. How successful an organization is at managing and influencing its employees is a critical element for predicting how effective and engaged the workforce is. Leadership that wants to effectively engage its workforce must pay attention to how their actions or lack of actions positively or negatively impact workforce productivity.


For example, Sam is a typical office worker who specializes in IT. He works from 9 am to 5 pm, has 60 minutes for lunch, and takes two 20-minute breaks. His active expected productivity is 380 minutes per day.

If managing people were only this easy. To influence workforce productivity is to understand what factors positively and negatively affect Sam’s workplace experience. Sam’s perceptions of his workload expectations have resulted in Sam feeling stressed and worried about his current work demand.


Like most employees, the longer Sam experiences stress without relief, the higher the risk that his productivity will be negatively impacted. That can be costly, because his inability to cope with stress may result in increased presenteeism and absenteeism.

Many internal and external factors influence Sam’s productivity. Yes, Sam has 380 minutes to be productive each day, but unlike a software program that runs the same way every time, each person is different. Employees can become distracted by the words their manager says, events that are happening at home, or internal conversations such as self-talk about their job satisfaction.

Indeed, employees have many intangible factors that come into play and collectively influence their contributions. Below are eight factors that provide a view as to how complex human capital workforce productivity can be to influence. These factors that strategic HR plans target include:


    • knowledge
    • skills
    • motivation
    • health
    • link to value chain
    • manager-employee relationship
    • culture
    • employee fit


How Sam perceives and navigates the above eight factors will shape and influence his work productivity. To make the point, consider a scale of 1 to 10, with a maximum score of 80, Sam’s score for each of the factors. A score of 30 would suggest that with more support and competencies Sam has potential for much higher productivity. Now consider a workforce of 1,000 employees, each with their own score. This perhaps is why workforce productivity with respect to influencing human capital workforce productivity is so complex. With so many variables at play, there is seldom one easy answer.

Employees are, indeed, expensive. The biggest-ticket item on most P&Ls is payroll, along with the additional costs that come with people, such as benefits, pension contributions, office space, equipment, supervision and training.


Read on to learn about Morneau Shepell’s Total Integrated Health Consulting approach, a structured approach organizations can take that is flexible enough to adapt to their needs.


Bill Howatt is Chief of Research and Development, Workforce Productivity for Morneau Shepell; Rochelle Morandini, Partner, Health Consulting; Jesse Adams, Health Consultant. Mike Roberts is Chief Human Resources Officer, Emera.

Image: rawpixels.com at Pexels

 

 

Rob McIntyreRob McIntyre

The use of reels is fundamental to the safe and efficient handling, transportation and distribution of wire and cable to the end user. The properties of wire and cable require reels to be robust and have certain structural specifications to ensure wire and cable goods are not compromised between the time they leave the factory to when they are installed on site. Wire and cable must be protected from any kind of mechanical damage, ingress of moisture, dirt and chemicals. Close attention must be paid to the temperature ratings of wire and cable; therefore, storage must be in an environment consistent with the rating.

Read More

 

Stephen LeeCEW caught up with General Manager of EiKO’s Canadian division Stephen Lee, who was kind enough to take some time out of his busy schedule to share his perspective on the industry.

EiKO is a global fixture, lamp and, more recently, controls manufacturer headquartered in Shawnee, Kansas. Additional locations include European operations in Frankfurt, Germany; APAC operations in Taiwan; and Canadian operations in Barrie, Ontario. EiKO also has five distribution centres in North America located in Ontario, Alberta, Kansas, Nevada, and New Jersey.

 

 

Read More

Q4 GDPGrowth in real gross domestic product (GDP) slowed to 0.1% in the fourth quarter, owing to a decrease in business investment and weak international trade. These declines were offset by increased household spending. Final domestic demand edged up 0.2%, after rising 0.8% in the third quarter.

The annual growth rate of Canada's real GDP was 1.6% for 2019, a deceleration from the 2.0% growth in 2018. By comparison, real GDP in the United States increased 2.3%.

 

 

 

Read More

 

Changing Scene

  • Prev
With the COVID-19 crisis underway, EFC is working diligently to provide current electrical ...
Submit your nomination for the EFC 2020 Trailblazer Award and EFC 2020 Industry ...
Hammond Power Solutions Inc. announced its financial results for the Fourth Quarter of 2019. ...
Electricity Human Resources Canada (EHRC) celebrated innovation and leadership in human resources ...
On January 31,2020, the new IDEA Connector will go live to over 6500 distributor locations with ...
Arlington Industries has announced the recipients of their rep sales awards for 2019.   ...
EDGE Global Supply, through its subsidiary Technology BSA, completed the acquisition of RK ...
AD is reporting total 2019 member sales across its 12 divisions were $46.3 billion, an increase of ...
WESCO International announces its results for the fourth quarter and full year 2019.   ...
After six years as president of AD’s Electrical Business Unit and chief marketing officer, Ed ...

ElectrofedDo you or an expert you know have an electrical topic that requires the attention of a greater audience? Are you and your company leading innovative strides and can benefit from sharing your expertise? Have your Product Section expertise and innovation recognized as a thought leader!

Electro-Federation Canada (EFC) is currently accepting proposals for product section members to be featured in an electro|POD podcast series to promote the innovation and best practices EFC’s various Product Sections are collaborating on.

Read More

 

 

 

 

Mary ShawNorth American electrical industry veteran Mary Shaw has been announced as the executive director of ETIM North America, a non-profit association charged with promoting and maintaining the ETIM global technical data classification standard in the U.S., Canada and Mexico.

ETIM North America (NA) is one of 22 ETIM federations around the world dedicated to propagating the ETIM classification model to assist manufacturing and distribution companies with the exchange and digitization of product information throughout the supply chain, to end users and to engineers and architects.

Read More

 

Legrand Lighting ControlsLegrand, North and Central America (LNCA) announced the acquisition, subject to closing, of Focal Point, a Chicago-based privately held manufacturer of architectural lighting products.

This acquisition is Legrand’s fifth addition to its Lighting Sector and marks the company’s elevation to a full solutions provider in the architectural lighting space. Legrand provides a high degree of autonomy to its lighting companies and supports Focal Point's business leadership team in the pursuit of innovation and growth. Legrand’s scale and infrastructure will allow Focal Point to deliver innovative lighting solutions to their customers, faster and with capabilities that are more robust.

Read More

 

 

Peers & Profiles

  • Prev
Sean Bernard is the Intelligent Controls Manager, Canada for Ideal Industries. Sean resides in ...
Christina Huang is a Senior Contracts Manager for Schneider Electric. She has a varied, technical ...
Jenny Ng is a Business Development Manager for the Power Solutions Division of Schneider Electric. ...
With over 60-years of experience in the lighting industry, CBC Lighting has established itself as a ...

Éric DeschênesLine Goyette

A new figure at the head of the electrification business unit and ABB Canada, Éric Deschênes is not a newcomer to the electrical industry. A long journey that we have already highlighted by emphasizing his passion for finding practical solutions that optimize the adoption of technologies. We met with him recently to discuss his new leadership role at ABB Canada and his projects. First, he would like to point out that recent changes to ABB Canada’s structure, as elsewhere in the world, have been made to decomplex the customer relationship. “The corporate matrix has been lightened to get closer to the customer,” says Éric.

Read More

 

Looking Back

Has no content to show!

Copper $US Dollar price per pound

Kerrwil Publications Great Place to Work. Certified December 2019 - December 2020

538 Elizabeth Street, Midland,Ontario, Canada L4R2A3 +1 705 527 7666
©2020 All rights reserved

Use of this Site constitutes acceptance of our Privacy Policy (effective 1.1.2016)
The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Kerrwil