Canadian Electrical Wholesaler

 

Aug 13, 2018

MarijuanaBy Heather Hettiarachchi

Recreational use of marijuana becomes legal on October 17. This has potentially serious implications for workplace health and safety. In this article, contributor Heather Hettiarachchi reviews a recent human rights decision considering whether who dismissed a worker for using medical marijuana on the job was discriminating on the basis of disability. Heather concludes her article with useful takeaways for employers.

In a recent decision, Aitchison v L&L Painting and Decorating Ltd., 2018 HRTO 238, the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal upheld the termination of an employee who was using marijuana at work, ostensibly for medical purposes.

Background

The employer was a commercial contractor involved in restoring high-rise buildings. The complainant worked for the employer as a seasonal painter from 2011 to 2015. The complainant suffered from chronic pain in his back and neck as a result of a degenerative disc disease and started using medical marijuana in March 2015 to manage the pain. Before that, he had been self-medicating with marijuana.

In order to perform his job, the complainant worked on a “swing stage” that was suspended outside the building. On the morning of June 18, 2015, the site supervisor saw the complainant smoking marijuana while on the swing stage, which was at a level of 37 floors. The complainant was also not wearing a hard hat and was untethered. The supervisor sent the complainant home in accordance with the general contractor’s zero tolerance policy on the use of intoxicating drugs and alcohol on the worksite, and the complainant was ultimately terminated on July 6 by the employer. The complainant then filed a human rights complaint on the ground of discrimination based on disability; namely, that the employer had failed to accommodate him.

What was said at the hearing

The complainant argued that his disability was a factor in the employer’s decision to terminate his employment and that in relying on the policy the employer failed to take an individualized approach to his accommodation needs. The complainant also argued that the employer should have inquired whether his use of marijuana was for medical purposes, or possibly part of an addiction.

The complainant also stated that he had an understanding with the site supervisor that he could medicate in a designated spot away from the rest of the crew during his breaks and that he medicated himself on the swing stage because he worked on the 37th floor, which left no time for him to go down to the ground level during his breaks.

The employer stated that it had terminated the complainant because of health and safety concerns relating to impairment while at work. The employer stated that it would have been reckless to have allowed the complainant to work in a potentially intoxicated state and that if the general contractor had observed these events the employer could have lost its contract.

The employer also produced evidence to show that subcontractors were contractually obliged to adopt the general contractor's policy and that zero-tolerance policies were common in the construction industry. The evidence also showed that all employees had been provided training, which included watching a health and safety video that referenced the policy.

Decision

The tribunal found that, given the health and safety risks inherent to that particular worksite, the dismissal of the complainant was not discriminatory and that the employer had not acted in a discriminatory manner. In reaching this decision, the Tribunal considered the following:

  • there was no evidence to indicate that the site supervisor had condoned the marijuana use
  • there was no evidence to indicate that the complainant had requested an accommodation in relation to the marijuana use
  • it was the complainant’s choice and preference to self-medicate while at work and if the complainant had asked his physician whether he should medicate at work, the physician would have instructed him not to, given the nature of the complainant’s job
  • there was no evidence to suggest the complainant was addicted to marijuana
  • the employer did not apply the policy in a mechanical way, but instead considered the specific circumstances

The tribunal noted that an employee does not have an absolute right to smoke marijuana at work regardless of whether it is used for medicinal purposes and that an employer is not required to accommodate preferences with regard to using marijuana if doing so would amount to undue hardship. The tribunal also noted that the employer had no obligation to consider whether it could reasonably accommodate the complainant after the fact, i.e., after the complainant had provided grounds for his termination. The tribunal further noted that it would not be reasonable to expect that the employer would have had to formally test the complainant’s level of impairment, before it could raise a health and safety issue.

In finding that the policy itself was not discriminatory, the tribunal considered the following:

  • zero tolerance policies are commonly used in the construction industry given the safety risks inherent in that industry
  • the employer adopted the policy in the honest belief that allowing someone intoxicated into the worksite was a serious risk to that individual as well as the public
  • the policy was reasonably necessary to protect the health and safety of the workers and the public
  • the policy did not impose automatic termination as a condition – it only required the removal of an intoxicated employee from the job site
  • the policy did not preclude the accommodation of employees who needed to use medical marijuana as such employees could be accommodated in non-safety sensitive positions
  • the policy did not stigmatize the use of marijuana based on its history as an illegal substance

Employer takeaways

  • Employees do not have an absolute right to smoke marijuana at work even for medicinal purposes.
  • An employer does not have to accommodate employee preferences in relation to marijuana use if it would result in undue hardship.
  • An employer is not required to consider whether an employee needs accommodation, after an employee has already provided the grounds on which the termination is based.
  • Note the factors to be considered in drafting a zero tolerance impairment policy

Heather Hettiarachchi, LLB; MSC; CPHR, is a lawyer, mediator and investigator with Integritas Workplace Law Corporation, which she founded to represent clients in human rights proceedings, arbitrations and labour board proceedings, employment standards proceedings, wrongful dismissal matters and privacy. She has excellent negotiation and dispute resolution skills and routinely settles issues before they proceed to trial/hearings. She is passionate about workplace integrity and focuses on educating clients on utilizing best practices to avoid/minimize workplace conflict; This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.; 604-816-8577; www.integritasworkplacelaw.com

Photo source: Herbal Hemp on Pixabay

 

OlsonBy Katrina Olson

A recent CEW article by David Gordon caught my eye. The headline was, Are Your Sales and Marketing Teams Inhibiting Growth?

As a marketing consultant, writer, and trainer, I recognized the challenges and barriers that David was writing about. We agree on many issues (and their causes) facing electrical distributors and marketers. But I also hear from marketing people all the time that the C-Suite is hindering their efforts which, in turn, hinders the company’s growth.  

Read More

 

 

 

2018 Electrical North American MeetingOn October 29-31, 2018, the AD Electrical North American Meeting drew over 1,000 attendees. This event attracted 151 first time attendees and representatives from over 362 companies in the United States, Canada and Mexico.

Attendees benefited from a variety of agenda topics, including: Network Meetings, Emerging Leaders Session, and Country-specific Business Meetings. New to this year’s agenda was a SPA Optimization Workshop led by industry veteran Mo Barsema. In addition, members and suppliers also attended a panel discussion on managing and measuring your digital success.

Read More

 

 

Changing Scene

  • Prev
NESCO Inc. has been recognized as an IMARK supplier partner, joining a group of IMARK preferred ...
Once again, Stelpro is recognized for the design excellence of its products, this time in the ...
Unique circumstances sometimes make it challenging, impractical, or even impossible for products to ...
AD, the member owned buying/marketing group, is merging with IDI Independent Distributors Inc. ...
Join CSA Group for a free webinar on Wednesday, February 20, 2019. Mitch Rushing, CSA Group ...
Effective September 1, 2019, Keith Assaff and Jody MacDonald will assume the positions of ...
DDS (Distributor Data Solutions), an e-commerce product content provider serving the electrical, ...
Todd Hughes will be based in Vancouver and responsible for managing and developing Viscor’s agency, ...
Pepperl+Fuchs is a provider of explosion protection components, including visualization products, ...
  Legrand North America is pleased to announce the appointment of Jennifer Eastman as ...

 

 EFC Announces 2018 Marketing Awards Winners

2018 Marketing Awards WinnersElectro-Federation Canada (EFC)’s Marketing Awards program recognizes member organizations that demonstrate marketing excellence and innovation within the Canadian electrical manufacturing and distribution industry. Winners of this year’s awards were recognized at EFC’s 8th Annual Future Forum, held earlier this month. (Shown in photo: EFC President and CEO Carole McGlogan with representatives from Bartle & Gibson, winners of the Integrated Marketing Award — distributor under $50 million.)Electro-Federation Canada (EFC)’s Marketing Awards program recognizes member organizations that demonstrate marketing excellence...

Read More

 

 

Peers & Profiles

  • Prev
On a regular basis, our publications profile members of our industry through their responses to a ...
First and foremost, sitting down with Susan Uthayakumar feels more like sitting down and conversing ...
Sales of electrical supplies from full-line electrical distributors capture the geographic ...
Laura Dempsey has been working as an outside sales representative for E.B. Horsman & Son for ...
Michael Gentile, President and CEO of Philips Lighting Canada, has had a long and distinguished ...

 

 Young Leaders: Taylor Gerrie

Taylor GerrieOn a regular basis, our publications profile members of our industry through their responses to a Q&A. It’s a way of recognizing industry movers and shakers, and helping our readers get to know them better. 

Recently we launched an initiative with Electro-Federation Canada's Young Professionals Network to include profiles of up-and-coming leaders. We provided the list of questions below to Taylor Gerrie, Automation Account Specialist at Gerrie Electric Wholesale Ltd. in Burlington, Ontario. Here are Taylor’s responses.

Read More

 

 

 

 

Susan Uthayakumar, President of Schneider Electric Canada: Driving Success

Susan UthayakumarBy Owen Hurst

First and foremost, sitting down with Susan Uthayakumar feels more like sitting down and conversing with a friend than conducting an interview with the Canadian president of one of the world’s largest electrical manufacturers. Of course, she exudes the confidence and knowledge her position demands, but equally identifiable are an open and engaging nature.

In a recent sit-down, we learned a little about Susan’s history and what drives her to succeed.

Read More

 

 

 

 

Looking Back

  • Prev
The best memory I keep from CEDA is the way that they accepted me when I came into the business. ...
In the 1930s to 1940s, CEDA’s Western Canada membership was very stable with old line independent ...
Prior to the late 1950s there was little if any involvement in CEDA by the so-called “national ...
  As 2017 marks the 150th anniversary of Confederation, we take a look back at an aspect of ...

Looking BackThe best memory I keep from CEDA is the way that they accepted me when I came into the business. The welcome they gave to me, all of them men. (In those days there were not many women in business.) This welcome I will always remember. CEDA has played a very important role in my success.

One year our conference was in Hamilton, Ontario. Mr. Caouillette, our speaker, got lost and instead of going to Hamilton went to Toronto. I think that that was the longest cocktail hour that CEDA ever had… waiting for him to arrive. Certainly that night the head table and everyone were in good spirits.

Read More

 

 


Looking BackLooking BackIn the 1930s to 1940s, CEDA’s Western Canada membership was very stable with old line independent companies like Horsman, Ashdowns, Brettell, Marshall Wells, Electrical Supplies Ltd., etc.

Small electrical distributors just were not acceptable for membership as they did not carry the main-line manufacturers’ goods, publish a wiring device catalogue, or employ four to five salesmen as CEDA requested.

Read More

 

 

 

Copper $US Dollar price per pound

Kerrwil Publications

538 Elizabeth Street, Midland,Ontario, Canada L4R2A3 +1 705 527 7666
©2019 All rights reserved

Use of this Site constitutes acceptance of our Privacy Policy (effective 1.1.2016)
The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Kerrwil